1. Introduction: The Weight of 71% in a Silicon-Hungry World
In the semiconductor industry, market share is usually a game of single-digit percentage points. Yet, as we move through 2025, a singular figure dominates the landscape: 71%. According to recent data from TrendForce, TSMC’s share of the global foundry market surged to a record 70.2% in Q2 2025, virtually capturing the entire premium tier of the chip manufacturing economy. This isn’t just a monopoly of logic wafers; it is a centralization of the entire AI infrastructure.
For chip designers and fabless companies, this concentration creates a paradoxical reality. While the theoretical performance of transistors continues to scale (albeit slowly), the availability of the finished product is increasingly dictated not by the silicon die itself, but by the advanced packaging required to connect it to high-bandwidth memory (HBM). The “71% share” narrative is thus less about raw wafer throughput and more about the strategic bottleneck of Advanced Packaging—specifically CoWoS (Chip-on-Wafer-on-Substrate) and SoIC (System-on-Integrated-Chips).
This article explores the deep interplay between foundry dominance, packaging constraints, and the skewed customer structure that leaves 99% of the industry fighting for the capacity crumbs left by the top three AI giants.
2. The Foundry Landscape: Inside the 71% Market Share
2.1 The Widening Gap: TSMC vs. The Rest
The semiconductor foundry market has bifurcated into “TSMC” and “Everyone Else.” With a 70.2% market share, TSMC has effectively cornered the market for sub-5nm processes.
- Samsung Foundry (7.3%): Despite aggressive roadmaps for GAA (Gate-All-Around) transistors at 3nm and 2nm, yield challenges and customer retention issues have kept their share in the single digits.
- SMIC (5.1%): Driven by domestic demand in China, SMIC remains a key player for mature nodes and legacy logic but faces restrictions in acquiring the EUV tools necessary for leading-edge competition.
- Intel Foundry: Still struggling to break into the top tier of pure-play foundry rankings significantly, as it pivots its IDM 2.0 strategy.
2.2 Why 71% Matters for Capacity
When one entity controls over two-thirds of the supply, “capacity allocation” becomes a euphemism for “gatekeeping.” The 71% share implies that for any high-performance computing (HPC) or AI chip project, there is effectively no second source. If you need 3nm logic paired with CoWoS-L packaging, the road leads to Hsinchu (or increasingly, Arizona and Kumamoto). This concentration gives the market leader unprecedented pricing power and the ability to handpick winners in the AI arms race.
3. The Real Bottleneck: Advanced Packaging (CoWoS & SoIC)
3.1 The CoWoS Crunch: Why Logic is Fast but Packages are Slow
The limiting factor for AI accelerators like NVIDIA’s Blackwell B200 or AMD’s MI300 isn’t the GPU die—it’s the packaging. CoWoS capacity has become the industry’s most precious resource.
- Demand vs. Supply: In 2023, monthly CoWoS capacity was roughly 10,000 wafers. By the end of 2025, TSMC aims for 30,000 to 35,000 wafers per month. Yet, demand is estimated to be nearly double that.
- Complexity: CoWoS-L (Local Silicon Interconnect) involves stitching multiple large dies and HBM stacks onto a massive organic substrate with active silicon bridges. The yield and cycle time for these packages are significantly longer than standard FC-BGA packaging.
3.2 SoIC: The Vertical Frontier
Beyond 2.5D packaging (CoWoS), 3D packaging via SoIC allows for stacking logic on logic or memory on logic without microbumps, using hybrid bonding. This technology is crucial for future bandwidth and power efficiency but is even more capacity-constrained. Current adoption is limited to ultra-premium customers like AMD (for X3D processors) and Apple, with massive barriers to entry for smaller players.
4. Customer Structure: The VIP Club and the “Long Tail”
4.1 The “Whales”: NVIDIA, Apple, and AMD
The “71% share” is not distributed equally. A massive portion of TSMC’s advanced capacity is reserved by a handful of “Super Whales.”
- NVIDIA: Reports indicate NVIDIA has booked over 50-70% of TSMC’s CoWoS capacity for 2026-2027. This aggressive booking effectively walls off competitors from scaling their own AI infrastructure.
- Apple: As the primary driver for 3nm and 2nm logic nodes, Apple enjoys “launch partner” status, ensuring its M-series and A-series chips receive priority access to new fab ramps.
4.2 The Impact on the “Long Tail” (Small & Medium Fabless)
For the thousands of other fabless companies—the “Long Tail”—this structure is suffocating.
- Extended Lead Times: Standard lead times for advanced nodes have stretched from 3-4 months to 6-12 months or more.
- Innovation Tax: Startups working on novel AI architectures or specialized ASICs find themselves priced out or queued out. They cannot commit to the volume guarantees required to secure line capacity, forcing them to rely on older nodes or second-tier OSATs (Outsourced Semiconductor Assembly and Test) which may lack the necessary IP integration.
5. Capacity vs. Opportunity: The Delivery Dilemma
5.1 The “Capacity Wall”
The convergence of high market share and packaging complexity has created a “Capacity Wall.”
- Allocation Mode: The market is currently in a permanent state of allocation. Foundries prioritize strategic partners who can co-invest in capacity or sign multi-year “take-or-pay” agreements.
- Pricing Pressure: Wafer prices for 3nm are reportedly exceeding $20,000, and advanced packaging adds a premium of 20-30% on top. This capital intensity raises the barrier to entry for new chip startups to venture capital-backed levels only.
5.2 Opportunities for Alternatives (FOPLP & OSATs)
The shortage at the top has created a spillover effect.
- OSAT Rise: Companies like ASE and Amkor are stepping up with “CoWoS-like” solutions (e.g., FOCoS) to capture the overflow.
- FOPLP (Fan-Out Panel Level Packaging): To reduce costs and increase throughput, the industry is looking at panel-level packaging. By processing chips on large rectangular panels rather than round wafers, throughput can be increased by 3X. This represents the best hope for the “Long Tail” to access advanced packaging performance at a viable price point in the coming years.
6. Conclusion: Navigating the Monolith
The “71% market share” figure is a warning signal as much as a business statistic. It highlights an industry that is dangerously centralized. For the next 3-5 years, success in the semiconductor sector will not just be about designing the best chip, but about securing the supply chain to build it. For the “Whales,” it is an expensive game of capacity reservation. For the rest, it is a race to find alternative packaging flows and second-source foundries that can offer “good enough” performance without the 12-month wait.
The balance of power has shifted. The foundry is no longer just a manufacturer; it is the kingmaker.
7. Q&A: Addressing Key Reader Concerns
Q1: Will the capacity shortage ease in 2026?
A: While TSMC and others are bringing new fabs online in Arizona, Japan, and Taiwan, demand for AI silicon is growing faster than concrete can be poured. Expect tightness to persist, especially for CoWoS packaging, well into 2027.
Q2: Can Samsung or Intel break TSMC’s 71% dominance?
A: Samsung needs to solve its yield issues to regain trust. Intel Foundry Services (IFS) has a promising roadmap with 18A, but needs to prove high-volume manufacturing capability to external customers. Breaking the 70% barrier will take years of consistent execution.
Q3: What should small fabless companies do?
A: Diversify. Design for flexibility. Consider using standard packaging where possible, or engage early with Tier-1 OSATs (ASE, Amkor) rather than relying solely on the foundry’s captive packaging capacity.
发表回复
要发表评论，您必须先登录。