RISC-V Growth in 2026: Tools, Software & Switching from ARM

In the rapidly evolving landscape of embedded computing, 2025 has become a watershed year for the RISC-V MCU architecture. No longer just an academic curiosity or a niche FPGA soft-core, RISC-V has firmly planted its flag in the commercial soil, challenging the decades-long dominance of ARM Cortex-M. For embedded engineers and decision-makers, the conversation has shifted from “Is RISC-V viable?” to “How quickly can we integrate it?”

This deep-dive analysis explores the three critical questions defining RISC-V commercial acceleration: the maturity of the toolchain, the depth of the software ecosystem, and the practical reality of migration and replaceability.

1. The Toolchain Maturity: Is It Ready for Prime Time?

The first barrier to entry for any new architecture is the development environment. For years, the “wild west” nature of open-source tools deterred conservative industries (automotive, industrial) from adopting RISC-V. However, the landscape in 2025 tells a different story.

Commercial Grade vs. Open Source

The dichotomy between “free” and “reliable” is fading.

• IAR Embedded Workbench & SEGGER Embedded Studio: These industry stalwarts now offer first-class support for RISC-V. The availability of IAR for RISC-V provides functional safety certification (ISO 26262), which is non-negotiable for automotive clients.
• GCC vs. LLVM: While GCC has historically been the default, LLVM (Clang) has made massive strides in code density and optimization for RISC-V. Recent benchmarks (SPEC CPU) show LLVM closing the gap, particularly in vectorization (RVV) support.
• Vendor-Specific IDEs: GigaDevice’s customized Eclipse-based tools, MounRiver Studio for WCH, and Espressif’s robust ESP-IDF (based on FreeRTOS/Zephyr) have lowered the barrier to entry significantly.

Debugging and Trace

The RISC-V Debug Specification has standardized the JTAG/cJTAG interfaces. Segger’s J-Link now supports a vast array of RISC-V cores, allowing engineers to use the same probes they used for ARM. The introduction of standardized trace (E-Trace) is finally addressing the “blind spot” in debugging complex real-time issues.

2. The Ecosystem: RTOS, Middleware, and the ‘Software Glue’

Hardware is useless without the software to run on it. The commercial acceleration of RISC-V is being fueled by a robust OS ecosystem.

The RTOS Battleground: FreeRTOS vs. Zephyr vs. RT-Thread

• FreeRTOS: Remains the safe, lightweight choice. Its port to RISC-V is mature, but it puts the burden of driver integration on the silicon vendor.
• Zephyr RTOS: This has emerged as a powerhouse for RISC-V. Its “batteries included” philosophy—abstracting hardware details via DeviceTree—makes it arguably the most “portable” OS for RISC-V. Major vendors like Nordic (and increasingly RISC-V players) are contributing heavily. The decoupling of application code from hardware specifics in Zephyr eases the transition from other architectures.
• RT-Thread: With strong roots in the Asian market, RT-Thread offers a “middle ground” with a rich component library (IoT connectivity, GUI) that rivals commercial offerings, often pre-integrated on chips from WCH and GigaDevice.

Middleware and Connectivity

The gap is closing in essential middleware:

• Connectivity: TCP/IP stacks (lwIP), Bluetooth LE, and Wi-Fi drivers are now standard on SoCs like the ESP32-C3 and C6.
• Security: The PSA Certified program is expanding to RISC-V, and Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) implementations (like OpenSBI) are standardizing secure boot and crypto operations.

3. The ‘Replaceability’ Question: Migrating from Cortex-M

This is the multi-million dollar question for engineering managers: Can I replace my STM32/NXP chip with a RISC-V equivalent without rewriting my entire codebase?

The ISA Migration: Thumb-2 vs. RVC

One of the biggest fears is code density. ARM’s Thumb-2 instruction set is legendary for efficiency. RISC-V answers this with the C-Extension (Compressed Instructions).

• Code Density: In most general-purpose control logic, RV32IMC (Integer, Multiply, Compressed) achieves code density comparable to ARM Cortex-M3/M4.
• Interrupt Handling: The ECLIC (Enhanced Core-Local Interrupt Controller) found in many commercial RISC-V chips (like GigaDevice’s) is designed to mimic the NVIC (Nested Vector Interrupt Controller) of ARM. This significantly reduces the mental overhead for firmware engineers porting ISRs (Interrupt Service Routines). It offers vectored interrupts, preemption, and tail-chaining, features that were once ARM exclusives.

Pin-to-Pin Compatibility

Vendors are aggressively targeting “drop-in” replacements. The GD32V series from GigaDevice, for instance, famously offered pin-compatibility with their own ARM-based counterparts and even some STM32F103 footprints. This hardware compatibility reduces the PCB redesign risk to near zero, leaving only the software porting effort.

Long-Term Supply and Sovereignty

“Replaceability” is also about supply chain security.

• Non-Market Factors: For many regions, the open nature of RISC-V (governed by RISC-V International in Switzerland) offers immunity to geopolitical trade restrictions that might affect proprietary ISAs.
• Vendor Commitment: Companies like WCH and GigaDevice are doubling down on Long-Term Supply commitments (10+ years), essential for industrial and automotive designs.

Case Study: A Theoretical Migration

Imagine migrating a sensor hub from a Cortex-M4 to a RISC-V RV32IMAC core.

1. Drivers: If using a HAL (Hardware Abstraction Layer) or Zephyr, the change is minimal—mostly Kconfig updates. If using bare-metal register access, the rewrite is substantial.
2. DSP: ARM’s CMSIS-DSP library has equivalents in the RISC-V ecosystem (NMSIS), often highly optimized for the P-extension (Packed SIMD) or standard math operations.
3. Build System: Switching from an ARM Compiler toolchain to CMake/Ninja with GCC/LLVM is often the most time-consuming step but yields a modern, flexible build environment.

Conclusion

The “commercial acceleration” of RISC-V is no longer a forecast; it is an operational reality. The tools are robust, the ecosystem is diverse (and perhaps more flexible than the incumbent), and the replaceability barrier is lower than ever thanks to thoughtful hardware design and OS abstraction. For the MCU market, RISC-V is not just an alternative; it is the inevitable expansion of the compute horizon.

---

FAQ: RISC-V Adoption in 2026

Q: Is RISC-V ready for automotive applications?

A: Yes. With ISO 26262 certified cores and toolchains (like IAR), and adoption by major players like Infineon and Renesas, RISC-V is entering the automotive safety domain (ASIL-B/D).

Q: How does RISC-V code density compare to ARM Thumb-2?

A: With the standard C-extension (Compressed instructions) enabled, RISC-V code density is very competitive, often within 10-15% of Thumb-2, which is negligible for modern Flash sizes.

Q: What is the best RTOS for a new RISC-V project?

A: It depends. Zephyr is recommended for complex, connected, multi-vendor projects due to its portability. FreeRTOS is best for simple, legacy-style “super-loop + scheduler” designs. RT-Thread is excellent for IoT devices requiring rich pre-integrated middleware.

Q: Can I use my existing J-Link debugger with RISC-V?

A: Yes, Segger J-Link has extensive support for RISC-V cores. You may need to update your firmware and ensure your specific target device is listed.